Rochester, New York
16 W Main Street, Suite 204
Rochester, NY 14614
(585) 546-5072
With 34 years of legal victories under his belt and countless satisfied clients behind him, Thomas A. Corletta, Attorney & Counselor at Law comes highly recommended.

Family Law Attorney Explains Grandparents’ Visitation Rights in New York March 16, 2018

Rochester, Monroe
Family Law Attorney Explains Grandparents’ Visitation Rights in New York, Rochester, New York

When a couple with children gets divorced, it is rarely just the nuclear family unit that is affected. Grandparents may end up spending considerably less time with their grandchildren because parents may not want to continue their relationship with the “ex’s” parents. Fortunately, many states recognize grandparents’ rights under family law. Below, Thomas A. Corletta, Attorney at Law in Rochester explains how it works in New York.

The Best Interests of the Children

In New York, family law recognizes that parents have the right to raise their children as they see fit. This includes controlling who spends time with them; however, the courts also recognize that awarding grandparents visitation can sometimes be in the best interests of the children.

Grandparents can secure visitation rights in certain circumstances.

A Pre-Existing Relationship

family law

Grandparents pursuing visitation rights must establish they had an existing relationship with the kids. The court wants to see a functional and well-established relationship between the grandparent and grandchild before considering whether it is in the best interests of the child to award visitation. The pre-existing relationship must be established before best interests can be considered.

A judge will consider if a prior relationship is established, and that the parents may be trying to keep the grandparent from the child, thus damaging the relationship. They will also take the child’s wishes into account, depending on age. However, grandparents should understand that parents have a Constitutional right to determine and control access to children, and to determine how they are raised. Absent any abuse or neglect by parents, “grandparent’s rights” are limited, and in New York,  if there was no pre-existing established relationship, may not exist at all.

If you want to learn more about grandparents’ rights or child custody arrangements, turn to Thomas A. Corletta, Attorney at Law. This seasoned family law attorney is proud to help clients throughout Monroe County resolve complicated legal disputes. When you hire Thomas Corletta, you get Thomas Corletta; he personally handles every case his criminal and civil trial practice accepts. Visit his website to learn more about all his areas of expertise, including criminal defense and bankruptcy. Schedule an initial consultation by calling (585) 546-5072 today. 

Other Announcements, Events and Deals from Thomas A. Corletta, Attorney at Law
People v. D.K. (Potter Tn. Ct., 1/11/2019), Rochester, New York
Mr. Corletta scored still another impressive victory, this time in rural, prosecution-oriented Yates County, in People v. D.K. (Potter Tn. Ct., 1/11/19). The difficulty of this case more
T.W. v. W.R. (Family Ct., 2018), Rochester, New York
Many times, lawyers must take unpopular positions on behalf of their clients. However, lawyers are required to advocate legal positions, not moral positions. Mr. Corletta had to more
People v. P. E. (Bkpt. Village Ct., 11/18)., Rochester, New York
Mr. Corletta achieves suppression of high BAC Chemical Test Result.   In a unique argument based upon current case law from the state’s highest Court, Mr. Corletta achieved more
People v. S.P. (Ont. Co. Ct., 10/28), Rochester, New York
Through sheer persistence, Mr. Corletta achieved a rare disposition in prosecution-oriented Ontario County in People v. S.P. (Ont. Co. Ct., 11/18).       & more
Case Review: People v. S.B., Rochester, New York
People v. S.B. (Macedon Tn. Ct., 10/23/18)   Mr. Corletta obtained another favorable disposition for a so-called “Domestic Violence” client in People v. S.B. (Macedon Tn. Ct., more